May be...
A1 - the best driver generally wins. I beg to differ.
Why? Because generally teams(or Countries, should I say) with the best and most experienced engineers generally are able to set up the car best for a particular track, given that the cars are all standard. If you look at the past few years of A1, most countries that have a heritage of motorsport generally perform a lot better over the entire season than countries that don't. So you see good and consistant performances from European countries such as Germany, France, Great Britain, etc. whereas Asian countries perform a lot worse. Driver wise, yes, some of them are better and more experienced than the others, but generally they are all pretty competent.
A1 driver = F1 dropout.
A1 = the best driver generally wins
But its up to each team to produce the best car, all teams apart form force India and Torro Rosso have the budget to produce a world beater but for one reason or another don't. Most years in F1 (not every) more than 1 car is capable of winning races, last year McLaren, ferrari, BMW and Renault were at times, the best. F1 has a relative freedom in car design, pushing to be the best of the best in technology, which i feel is a large part of the appeal.
In A1 GP, the cars all have the same motor and chassis and its up to setup and skill to come out on top but there is no real team to support, just country, which I feel isn't right in motor sport, this is why I never watch GP2 and A1 GP, each race series has their own rules and fans, which is fair enough.
Such as Daytona and Talladaga when the big one happens.
I mean look at how David Guilliand got into cup cars. Granted he has been around for a while but it was totally unexpected the way he won his race and got a cup ride.
But now he is showing what he is made of with an unsponsored team, and I wish him all the best.com1 irq
No comments:
Post a Comment